Achieving a society where individual freedom is maximized, government intervention is minimized, and free market capitalism is promoted, while also supporting some level of social safety net and foreign intervention for the protection of human rights.
NL>NL ChatGPTNo, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs |
Neo-Libertarianism answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs
This answer aligns closely with Neo-Libertarian ideals of reducing government spending and intervention across the board, not just in healthcare but in all social programs, advocating for a more laissez-faire approach to economics and personal welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs
Neo-Libertarians would strongly agree with this statement, as they believe in reducing government spending and intervention in the economy. They argue that individuals should be responsible for their own welfare, and that the free market can provide better solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
Neo-Libertarians would likely agree with this statement, as they generally believe in reducing government spending and intervention in the economy. They would argue that individuals should be responsible for their own healthcare costs, and that the free market can provide better solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, and abolish Medicaid
Abolishing Medicaid would be in line with the Neo-Libertarian goal of minimizing government involvement in healthcare. However, some Neo-Libertarians might prefer a phased approach or a minimal safety net, slightly tempering their support for outright abolition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, and abolish Medicaid
Neo-Libertarians would likely agree with this statement, as they generally oppose government-run healthcare systems. They believe that such systems limit individual freedom and choice, and that they can lead to inefficiencies and lower quality of care. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage
Neo-Libertarianism would likely support devolving power to the states, as this reduces the scope of federal government and increases local control, which is in line with their principles of smaller government and more personal freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
This aligns with the Neo-Libertarian emphasis on reducing government spending and intervention. However, some Neo-Libertarians might support a minimal safety net, which could make them slightly less supportive of a blanket 'no' without qualifications. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage
Neo-Libertarians would likely agree with this statement, as they generally support decentralization and believe that states should have the power to make their own decisions about healthcare coverage. However, they would still prefer a minimal role for government in healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled
While Neo-Libertarians generally oppose government intervention in healthcare, they might agree with this statement to some extent, as they recognize that some vulnerable groups, such as the elderly and disabled, may need assistance. However, they would still prefer a minimal role for government in healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled
While this answer restricts eligibility and thus government spending, which Neo-Libertarians would view positively, it still involves government intervention in healthcare, which they generally oppose. The support is therefore moderate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled
While Neo-Libertarians generally oppose government intervention in healthcare, they might slightly disagree with this statement, as they recognize that some vulnerable groups, such as the elderly and disabled, may need assistance. However, they would still prefer a minimal role for government in healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled
While this answer does propose limiting government involvement to specific groups, the increase in funding for even a limited demographic goes against the Neo-Libertarian principle of reducing government spending and intervention in healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Neo-Libertarianism generally emphasizes a significant reduction in government intervention in personal lives, including fiscal policies. This ideology would likely oppose increased federal funding for health care for low-income individuals, as it would prefer market-based solutions and minimal government spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Neo-Libertarianism generally advocates for limited government intervention in individual lives, including in the area of healthcare. They would likely disagree with increasing federal funding for Medicaid, as they believe in personal responsibility and free market solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system
Switching to a single-payer healthcare system would represent a significant increase in government control and spending, which is directly opposed to Neo-Libertarian principles of minimal government and market-driven solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system
Neo-Libertarians would strongly disagree with this statement, as they oppose government-run healthcare systems. They believe that such systems limit individual freedom and choice, and that they can lead to inefficiencies and lower quality of care. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Neo-Libertarianism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
