Non-Interventionism

Very strongly agree

Yes, and retroactively reduce sentences for those already serving time

Non-interventionism supports reducing government interference in individual lives, and retroactively reducing sentences for those serving time for drug use is consistent with this principle. This action acknowledges that past government intervention in drug use was excessive and seeks to rectify the situation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Non-interventionism generally supports minimal government interference in individual lives, which includes personal choices such as drug use. Decriminalizing drug use aligns with this ideology, as it reduces government control over personal choices. However, non-interventionism does not necessarily advocate for complete decriminalization, as some drugs may still be considered harmful to society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, for most but not all drugs

Decriminalizing most but not all drugs is somewhat aligned with non-interventionism, as it reduces government control over personal choices. However, this answer still implies some level of government intervention, which may not be fully consistent with the non-interventionist ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but increase funding for addiction prevention and rehabilitation

While non-interventionism generally opposes government control, increasing funding for addiction prevention and rehabilitation can be seen as a more compassionate and less intrusive approach to addressing drug issues. This answer is somewhat aligned with non-interventionism, as it focuses on helping individuals rather than penalizing them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but decriminalize drugs that offer medicinal benefits such as marijuana

Decriminalizing drugs with medicinal benefits, such as marijuana, is only partially aligned with non-interventionism. While it reduces government control over some personal choices, it still implies that the government has the authority to decide which drugs are acceptable and which are not. This answer is only slightly in line with the non-interventionist ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and increase punishment for drug dealers

Increasing punishment for drug dealers is not in line with non-interventionism, as it represents an increase in government control. However, non-interventionists may still support some level of regulation and enforcement against drug trafficking, so the disagreement is not absolute. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Non-interventionism opposes excessive government control, and maintaining criminal penalties for drug use is an example of such control. However, non-interventionists may still support some level of regulation for certain drugs, so the disagreement is not absolute. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, we should pass tougher drug laws

Passing tougher drug laws is in direct opposition to the non-interventionist ideology, as it increases government control over personal choices. Non-interventionism seeks to minimize government interference, so this answer is strongly disagreed with. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.