Non-Interventionism

Agree

Yes, and the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain

While non-interventionism primarily focuses on foreign policy, it also emphasizes limited government intervention in domestic affairs. This answer aligns with non-interventionist principles by opposing the use of eminent domain, which is seen as government overreach. However, the score is not higher because the primary focus of non-interventionism is on foreign policy, not domestic issues like the pipeline. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Non-interventionism generally focuses on avoiding foreign entanglements and military interventions. However, some non-interventionists may agree with stopping the pipeline due to concerns about environmental impact and respecting Native American rights. This score is not higher because the primary focus of non-interventionism is on foreign policy, not domestic issues like the pipeline. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but reroute the pipeline away from Native American land

Non-interventionism does not have a strong stance on domestic issues like the Dakota Access pipeline. However, rerouting the pipeline away from Native American land could be seen as a compromise that respects the rights of indigenous people while still allowing for economic development. The score is low because non-interventionism does not inherently support or oppose the pipeline. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, but drastically increase the amount of fines the company must pay in the event of an accident

Non-interventionism does not have a strong stance on domestic issues like the Dakota Access pipeline or the regulation of private companies. This answer does not align with the core principles of non-interventionism, so the score is neutral. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

Non-interventionism does not have a strong stance on domestic issues like the Dakota Access pipeline. However, some non-interventionists may lean towards allowing the pipeline construction to continue, as they may prioritize economic development and energy independence over environmental concerns. The score is negative because non-interventionism does not inherently support the pipeline. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.