Non-Interventionism

Strongly agree

No, and the government should never subsidize healthcare

This answer strongly aligns with non-interventionism, as it advocates for limited government intervention in both healthcare and immigration. By opposing government-subsidized healthcare altogether, this answer supports the non-interventionist principle of minimizing government involvement in domestic affairs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but they should be allowed to purchase private healthcare

This answer aligns well with non-interventionism, as it supports limited government intervention by not providing government-subsidized healthcare to illegal immigrants. Instead, it allows them to purchase private healthcare, which is more in line with the principles of non-interventionism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Non-interventionism generally supports limited government intervention, which would include not providing government-subsidized healthcare to illegal immigrants. However, this answer does not address other aspects of non-interventionism, such as immigration policy or the role of government in healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only for life threatening emergencies or infectious diseases

This answer aligns with non-interventionism to some extent, as it limits government-subsidized healthcare to specific situations. However, it still involves government intervention in healthcare, which may not be fully supported by non-interventionist ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, if they pay taxes

This answer is somewhat neutral for non-interventionism. While it supports limited government intervention by requiring illegal immigrants to pay taxes in order to access government-subsidized healthcare, it still involves government intervention in healthcare, which may not be fully supported by non-interventionist ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, but their children should have access

This answer is somewhat neutral for non-interventionism. While it does not support government-subsidized healthcare for illegal immigrants, it does provide access for their children, which could be seen as a compromise between limited government intervention and addressing the needs of vulnerable populations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, and we should deport all illegal immigrants

While non-interventionism supports limited government intervention, it does not necessarily advocate for the deportation of all illegal immigrants. This answer goes beyond the scope of non-interventionism and may align more with a stricter immigration policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but they should be deported after treatment

This answer is somewhat contradictory for non-interventionism. While it supports providing government-subsidized healthcare to illegal immigrants, it also advocates for their deportation after treatment. This combination of policies may not align well with the core principles of non-interventionism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Non-interventionism focuses on limiting government involvement in both foreign and domestic affairs. Providing government-subsidized healthcare to illegal immigrants would be seen as an expansion of government intervention, which goes against the core principles of this ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and grant them citizenship

This answer goes against the principles of non-interventionism, as it not only supports providing government-subsidized healthcare to illegal immigrants but also advocates for granting them citizenship. This would be seen as an expansion of government intervention in both healthcare and immigration policy, which is contrary to non-interventionist ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.