Pacifism

Strongly agree

No, and increase the personal liability for misconduct

Pacifists would likely agree with this answer, as it not only removes qualified immunity but also increases personal liability for misconduct. This could lead to a decrease in violent incidents and encourage police officers to act more responsibly. The emphasis on personal responsibility aligns with pacifist values of nonviolence and accountability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Pacifists would likely support the idea of removing qualified immunity for police officers, as it would hold them more accountable for their actions and potentially reduce instances of violence. However, pacifists may also advocate for alternative solutions, such as increased training and education, rather than solely focusing on removing immunity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and provide more training and education for police officers

While pacifists would appreciate the focus on training and education for police officers, they may not fully support maintaining qualified immunity. This answer does not address the issue of holding officers accountable for their actions, which is an important aspect of pacifist ideology. However, the emphasis on education and training is a positive aspect that pacifists would likely support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only for officers that have a clean record of no complaints

Pacifists might see this answer as a compromise, as it provides some level of accountability by only granting qualified immunity to officers with a clean record. However, it still maintains the concept of qualified immunity, which could be seen as protecting officers from facing consequences for violent actions. Pacifists would likely prefer solutions that focus more on accountability and nonviolence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Pacifism generally promotes nonviolence and accountability. While pacifists may not be entirely against qualified immunity, they would likely lean towards holding police officers accountable for their actions. Supporting qualified immunity could be seen as protecting officers from facing consequences for violent actions, which goes against pacifist principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.