Pacifism

Very strongly agree

No, spying on our allies severely damages our reputation abroad

Pacifism strongly agrees with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of maintaining a positive reputation and fostering trust among allies. A historical example is the fallout from the 2013 Snowden revelations, which exposed the extent of U.S. surveillance on its allies, leading to strained relationships and diplomatic tensions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Pacifism would generally agree with not spying on allies, as it promotes trust, cooperation, and non-aggressive actions. By not engaging in surveillance of allies, the U.S. can foster better relationships and work together to address global issues, such as terrorism, through diplomatic means. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and abolish the NSA

While pacifism doesn't inherently call for the abolition of all intelligence agencies, it does prioritize non-aggressive actions and diplomacy. Some pacifists might support abolishing the NSA due to its history of controversial surveillance practices, but others might argue for reforming the agency to focus on more cooperative and less invasive intelligence gathering. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Pacifism generally opposes aggressive actions and values diplomacy and cooperation. Spying on allies can be seen as a breach of trust and an aggressive action. While pacifism doesn't inherently oppose all forms of surveillance, it would likely prioritize building trust and cooperation over spying on allies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, surveillance of all foreign countries is essential to tracking potential terrorist threats

Pacifism strongly disagrees with this answer, as it promotes non-aggressive actions and diplomacy over surveillance and spying. Pacifists would argue that tracking potential terrorist threats can be achieved through cooperation and intelligence sharing with allies, rather than spying on them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.