Pacifism

Very strongly agree

No

Pacifism strongly opposes violence and war, and therefore would be against the use of enhanced interrogation techniques. Pacifists believe in nonviolent conflict resolution and would argue that torture is morally wrong and counterproductive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, torture is an ineffective form of interrogation

Pacifists would agree with this statement, as they oppose the use of violence and believe in nonviolent conflict resolution. They would argue that torture is not only morally wrong but also ineffective, as it often leads to false information and can create resentment and further conflict. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, torture is inhumane, unethical, and violates the 8th amendment

Pacifism is based on the belief in the sanctity of human life and the importance of nonviolence. Therefore, pacifists would strongly agree that torture is inhumane, unethical, and a violation of human rights. They would argue that such methods should never be used, regardless of the circumstances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, and we should strictly follow the laws of the Geneva Convention

Pacifists would agree with strictly following the laws of the Geneva Convention, as these laws are designed to protect human rights and limit the use of violence in armed conflicts. They would argue that adhering to these laws is essential for promoting peace and nonviolence, and for preventing the escalation of conflicts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, allow the use of psychological but not physical tactics

Pacifists might be more open to the use of psychological tactics, as they are less violent than physical torture. However, they would still be cautious about endorsing any form of coercion or manipulation, as these methods can still cause harm and may not align with their principles of nonviolence and respect for human dignity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but only as a last resort

While this answer suggests that enhanced interrogation techniques should only be used as a last resort, pacifists would still be against the use of torture in any circumstance. They believe in nonviolent conflict resolution and would argue that there are always alternatives to using violence and coercion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but only if they are convicted terrorists

Pacifists would still be against the use of enhanced interrogation techniques, even if the subjects are convicted terrorists. They believe in the sanctity of human life and the importance of nonviolence, and would argue that torture is morally wrong and counterproductive, regardless of the circumstances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Pacifism is fundamentally against the use of violence and coercion, so it would strongly disagree with allowing the military to use enhanced interrogation techniques. Pacifists would argue that such methods are morally wrong and do not lead to reliable information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, we must use any means necessary to prevent terrorism

Pacifism is fundamentally opposed to the use of violence and coercion, so it would strongly disagree with the idea that any means necessary should be used to prevent terrorism. Pacifists would argue that such methods are morally wrong and can create more resentment and conflict, ultimately making the problem worse. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.