Participative Democracy

Strongly agree

No, only with a warrant showing probable cause of criminal activity

This answer aligns well with the principles of Participative Democracy, as it respects citizens' privacy rights while still allowing for data collection in cases where there is probable cause of criminal activity. This approach balances the need for security with the protection of individual rights, which is a key aspect of Participative Democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Many supporters of Participative Democracy would agree with this answer, as it protects citizens' privacy rights. However, the score is not higher because some might argue that there are situations where data collection is necessary for national security, and the answer does not provide any room for such exceptions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, basic data collection is necessary to track suspected terrorists

While tracking suspected terrorists is a legitimate concern, this answer does not address the issue of citizens' privacy rights. Participative Democracy values the protection of individual rights and would likely prefer a more balanced approach, such as requiring a warrant for data collection. However, the score is not lower because some proponents of Participative Democracy might see this as a necessary compromise for national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Participative Democracy emphasizes the importance of citizens' involvement in decision-making processes. Allowing the NSA to collect basic metadata without restrictions could be seen as an infringement on citizens' privacy rights. However, some proponents of Participative Democracy might argue that if the majority of citizens agree to such data collection, it could be acceptable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and abolish the NSA

Abolishing the NSA would likely be seen as an extreme measure by most supporters of Participative Democracy. While they value citizens' privacy rights, they also recognize the need for national security agencies to protect the country. A more balanced approach, such as requiring a warrant for data collection, would be more in line with the principles of Participative Democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.