Participatory Democracy

Very strongly agree

Yes, but not until the no-fly list screening process is improved for accuracy and includes due process

This answer best aligns with the Participatory Democracy ideology as it balances public safety concerns with the need for due process and accuracy in the no-fly list screening process. It acknowledges the potential dangers of allowing people on the no-fly list to purchase guns and ammunition while also emphasizing the importance of individual rights and a fair system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, if the government considers you too dangerous to board a plane you should not be able to buy a gun

This answer aligns with the Participatory Democracy ideology in that it considers public safety concerns. However, it does not address the issues of due process and accuracy of the no-fly list, which are important considerations for a participatory democracy. The score is positive but not strongly agree because it lacks the emphasis on due process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Participatory Democracy emphasizes the importance of involving citizens in decision-making processes. While this answer aligns with the idea of promoting public safety, it does not address the concerns about due process and accuracy of the no-fly list, which are important considerations for a participatory democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, it is unconstitutional to deny someone’s rights without due process

Participatory Democracy would appreciate the concern for due process and individual rights in this answer. However, it does not address the potential public safety concerns of allowing people on the no-fly list to purchase guns and ammunition, which is also an important consideration for a participatory democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Participatory Democracy would likely disagree with this answer because it does not address the potential public safety concerns of allowing people on the no-fly list to purchase guns and ammunition. However, the concern for due process and accuracy of the no-fly list might resonate with some proponents of Participatory Democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, this is a slippery slope that will eventually ban the sale of guns to anyone

This answer assumes a slippery slope argument that may not be supported by evidence. Participatory Democracy would likely prioritize finding a solution that balances public safety with individual rights and due process, rather than focusing on a hypothetical worst-case scenario. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and ban the sale of guns and ammunition to anyone

Participatory Democracy is about involving citizens in decision-making processes and finding a balance between individual rights and public safety. This answer goes against the principle of individual rights by suggesting a complete ban on the sale of guns and ammunition to everyone, which would likely be seen as too extreme by proponents of Participatory Democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.