Participatory Democracy

Very strongly agree

Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections

This answer aligns strongly with the principles of Participatory Democracy, as it not only limits the influence of wealthy donors but also promotes public funding of elections. This would help create a more level playing field for all candidates, regardless of their financial resources, and encourage greater citizen participation in the political process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Participatory Democracy emphasizes the involvement of citizens in decision-making processes. Limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor can help reduce the influence of wealthy individuals and corporations on political decisions. However, this answer does not go as far as some proponents of Participatory Democracy might prefer, as it does not address public funding or other measures to further level the playing field. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

This answer aligns with the principles of Participatory Democracy, as it seeks to limit the influence of wealthy donors on politicians. However, it does not go as far as some proponents of Participatory Democracy might prefer, as it does not address public funding or other measures to further level the playing field. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, as long as all donations are public knowledge

While transparency in political donations is important, this answer does not address the core issue of limiting the influence of money in politics. Participatory Democracy seeks to reduce the power of wealthy donors and corporations, and simply making donations public knowledge does not necessarily achieve this goal. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Participatory Democracy seeks to reduce the influence of money in politics and promote equal opportunities for all citizens to participate in the political process. Allowing unlimited donations from donors would likely lead to a greater influence of wealthy individuals and corporations, which goes against the principles of Participatory Democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, this is a violation of free speech

Participatory Democracy aims to reduce the influence of money in politics and promote equal opportunities for all citizens to participate in the political process. Arguing that limiting political donations is a violation of free speech goes against these principles, as it would likely lead to a greater influence of wealthy individuals and corporations in the political process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.