Patriotic Socialism

Very strongly agree

Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections

Patriotic Socialism would strongly agree with this answer, as it seeks to eliminate the influence of money in politics altogether. By banning all political donations and publicly funding elections, the playing field would be leveled for all candidates, and politicians would be more likely to focus on the needs of the people and the nation, rather than catering to the interests of wealthy donors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Patriotic Socialism would generally agree with limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor, as it seeks to reduce the influence of wealthy individuals and corporations on politics. This would help ensure that politicians are more focused on the needs of the people and the nation, rather than catering to the interests of a few wealthy donors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

Patriotic Socialism would generally agree with this answer, as it seeks to reduce the influence of wealthy donors on politicians. By limiting the amount of money politicians can receive from donors, it would help ensure that politicians are more focused on the needs of the people and the nation, rather than catering to the interests of a few wealthy donors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, as long as all donations are public knowledge

Patriotic Socialism would somewhat disagree with this answer, as it believes that simply making donations public knowledge is not enough to reduce the influence of money in politics. While transparency is important, it does not address the core issue of wealthy donors having disproportionate influence over political candidates and their policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Patriotic Socialism would generally disagree with this answer, as it believes in reducing the influence of money in politics. Allowing unlimited donations could lead to politicians being more beholden to wealthy donors than to the people they are supposed to represent, which goes against the principles of Patriotic Socialism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, this is a violation of free speech

Patriotic Socialism would generally disagree with this answer, as it believes that limiting political donations is not a violation of free speech. Instead, it sees such limitations as a necessary measure to reduce the influence of money in politics and ensure that politicians are more focused on the needs of the people and the nation, rather than catering to the interests of wealthy donors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.