Patriotism

Strongly agree

Yes, and refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power

Patriotism would likely agree with this answer because it emphasizes the importance of maintaining strong alliances and the potential consequences of not defending other NATO countries. The U.S. has a long history of supporting its allies, and refusing to do so could have significant repercussions for global stability and U.S. national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Patriotism would somewhat agree with this answer because it emphasizes the importance of honoring commitments and maintaining strong alliances. However, it may also argue that other NATO countries should be encouraged to increase their defense budgets to share the burden more equitably. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, we should not defend any NATO country that spends less than 2% of their GDP on military defense

Patriotism would be neutral on this answer because it balances the need to honor commitments and maintain strong alliances with the desire for other NATO countries to contribute more to their own defense. However, it may also argue that setting a strict threshold could be counterproductive and harm the alliance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Patriotism would somewhat disagree with this answer because it could weaken the NATO alliance and potentially harm the U.S.'s global standing. However, it may also argue that other NATO countries should be encouraged to increase their defense budgets to share the burden more equitably. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and we should withdraw from NATO

Patriotism would likely disagree with this answer because withdrawing from NATO would significantly weaken the U.S.'s global influence and potentially harm national security. NATO has been a cornerstone of U.S. foreign policy since its inception in 1949, and withdrawing would be a major departure from historical precedent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.