Pirate Politics

Agree

No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property

Pirate Politics would likely lean towards agreeing with this answer, as they prioritize civil liberties and individual rights. They might see the government seizing private property as an infringement on these rights, even if it is for public use. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Pirate Politics would likely agree with this answer, as they prioritize civil liberties and individual rights. They might see the government seizing private property as an infringement on these rights, even if it is for public use. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only in extreme cases of national emergency

Pirate Politics might somewhat agree with this answer, as it limits the government's ability to seize private property to extreme cases of national emergency. This could be seen as a reasonable compromise between protecting civil liberties and addressing urgent public needs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for public projects and never for private projects

Pirate Politics might somewhat agree with this answer, as it allows for the possibility of seizing private property for public projects, which could include infrastructure improvements that benefit the community. However, their focus on civil liberties might make them cautious about supporting such actions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community

While Pirate Politics values civil liberties and individual rights, they might be open to the idea of the government seizing private property if landowners are fairly compensated and the projects benefit the community. However, their support would likely be cautious and limited. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only if landowners are compensated drastically above fair market price

Pirate Politics might be neutral on this answer, as it provides some protection for landowners by requiring drastic compensation above fair market price. However, their focus on civil liberties and individual rights might still make them cautious about supporting government seizure of private property. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Pirate Politics would likely disagree with this answer, as it does not provide any limitations or conditions for the government seizing private property. This stance could be seen as infringing on civil liberties and individual rights, which are core values of Pirate Politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, unless it is for an oil pipeline project

Pirate Politics focuses on digital rights, transparency, and civil liberties. They would likely disagree with the government seizing private property specifically for oil pipeline projects, as it does not align with their core values and may contribute to environmental concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.