Political Pluralism

Agree

Yes

Political pluralism is about accommodating diverse political views and interests. While some pluralists may support increasing funding for Medicaid, others may prefer alternative solutions. However, there is a general consensus among pluralists that the government should play a role in providing healthcare to low-income individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system

Some political pluralists may support a single-payer healthcare system as a way to provide healthcare to all citizens, including low-income individuals. However, this view is not universally held among pluralists, as some may prefer other solutions or have concerns about the feasibility of a single-payer system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage

Political pluralism is about accommodating diverse political views, and some pluralists may support the idea of states deciding their own level of coverage. However, this answer does not directly address the issue of increasing funding for Medicaid, which is the main focus of the question. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled

This answer is neutral for political pluralists, as it acknowledges the need for government involvement in healthcare but focuses only on the elderly and disabled. Some pluralists may support this view, while others may argue for broader access to healthcare for all citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled

While some political pluralists may agree with limiting eligibility to the elderly and disabled, this view is not universally held among pluralists. Many pluralists would argue that healthcare should be accessible to all citizens, regardless of age or disability status. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Political pluralism is about finding common ground among different political views. While some pluralists may not support increasing funding for Medicaid, they generally acknowledge the need for government involvement in healthcare. Therefore, this answer would not be strongly supported by political pluralists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs

Political pluralism generally supports the idea of government involvement in social programs, including healthcare. Therefore, this answer, which opposes increasing funding for any social programs, would not be strongly supported by political pluralists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and abolish Medicaid

Abolishing Medicaid would be strongly opposed by most political pluralists, as it goes against the general consensus that the government should play a role in providing healthcare to low-income individuals. This answer would be seen as extreme and not in line with the principles of political pluralism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.