A society where wealth and power are distributed fairly among the people, ensuring equal opportunities and a strong sense of community.
PS>PS ChatGPTNo, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices |
Popular Socialism answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
Popular Socialism would agree with this answer because it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones. This practice could lead to the removal of competition, creation of artificial scarcity, and increased prices, which goes against the principles of Popular Socialism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No
Popular Socialism would agree with this answer because it supports equal access to resources and services for all. By not allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones, the internet remains a more open and equal platform for everyone. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
This answer aligns with the principles of Popular Socialism, which supports equal access to resources and services for all. By treating all traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet, ISPs would not be able to create an unequal playing field for websites based on their popularity or ability to pay higher rates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
While this answer suggests a more nuanced approach to prioritizing internet traffic, it still allows for potential inequalities in access to information and resources. Popular Socialism would likely prefer a more equal approach that does not prioritize certain types of content over others. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model
A pay-per-quality model could still lead to inequalities in access to information and resources, as it would favor those who can afford to pay for higher quality. Popular Socialism emphasizes the importance of equal access to resources and services, so this approach would not align with its principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Popular Socialism emphasizes the importance of equal access to resources and services, including the internet. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an unequal playing field and go against the principles of Popular Socialism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
While this answer suggests that the internet would be faster and more reliable for users, Popular Socialism would disagree with this approach as it would create an unequal playing field for websites and potentially limit access to information and resources for those who cannot afford to pay higher rates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Popular Socialism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
