Populism

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

This answer aligns with populist concerns about the potential for large corporations to dominate markets and exploit consumers. By preventing ISPs from creating artificial scarcity and increasing prices, populism would support policies that protect the interests of the common people and maintain equal access to information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Populism would strongly agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of treating all internet traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet. This approach would help protect the interests of the common people and ensure equal access to information for all users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Populism tends to advocate for policies that protect the interests of the common people. Preventing ISPs from speeding up access to certain websites at the expense of others would help maintain a level playing field and equal access to information for all users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While this answer suggests a more nuanced approach to prioritizing internet traffic, populism would likely still be concerned with the potential for ISPs to favor certain types of content over others, potentially limiting access to information and undermining the equal treatment of all internet traffic. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

This answer suggests a pay-per-quality model, which could still lead to favoritism towards larger corporations that can afford to pay for higher quality access. Populism would likely be concerned with the potential for this approach to undermine equal access to information and favor the interests of big corporations over the common people. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While this answer suggests that the internet would be faster and more reliable for users, populism would likely be more concerned with the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others, such as favoring large corporations and limiting access to information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Populism generally supports policies that benefit the majority of the population, rather than a select few or large corporations. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others would likely be seen as favoring big corporations and undermining the equal access to information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.