Transcending national boundaries and fostering global cooperation will lead to a more peaceful, equitable, and sustainable world.
PN>PN ChatGPTNo, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices |
Post-Nationalism answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
Post-nationalism strongly supports equal opportunities and access for all. This answer highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites, such as removing competition, creating artificial scarcity, and increasing prices. These consequences go against the principles of post-nationalism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
Treating all traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet aligns with the principles of post-nationalism, which emphasizes global cooperation and equal opportunities for all. This approach ensures that the internet remains a platform where everyone has an equal chance to succeed. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
Post-nationalism supports equal opportunities and access for all, regardless of their popularity or financial capabilities. By not allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones, the internet remains a more open and equal platform for everyone. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
While prioritizing traffic by type rather than source might seem like a more equitable approach, it still allows for potential discrimination and unequal access. Post-nationalism would prefer a more neutral approach that treats all traffic equally, regardless of type or source. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model
A pay-per-quality model might seem fair at first glance, but it could still lead to unequal access and opportunities for smaller or less financially capable websites. Post-nationalism would prefer an approach that ensures equal access for all, regardless of their ability to pay for higher quality service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
While post-nationalism might appreciate the potential for faster and more reliable internet, the negative consequences of creating an unequal playing field for websites outweigh the benefits. Post-nationalism would prioritize equal access over potential speed improvements. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Post-nationalism emphasizes global cooperation and equal opportunities for all. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an unequal playing field, which goes against the principles of post-nationalism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Post-Nationalism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
