Try the political quiz

Pro-Peace Politics policy on muslim surveillance

Topics

Should local police increase surveillance and patrol of Muslim neighborhoods?

PPP>PPP  ChatGPTNo, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary

Pro-Peace Politics answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary

Pro-Peace Politics strongly agrees with this answer because it emphasizes the unconstitutionality, racism, and incendiary nature of targeting Muslims for increased surveillance. This aligns with the ideology's commitment to peace, equality, and justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, this decision should be based on crime rates instead of race or religion

Pro-Peace Politics strongly agrees with this answer because it promotes a fair and unbiased approach to policing, focusing on crime rates rather than race or religion. This aligns with the ideology's commitment to peace, equality, and justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods

Pro-Peace Politics agrees with this answer because it suggests increasing surveillance and patrol in high crime neighborhoods, which is a more equitable approach to policing. However, the score is not the highest because it does not explicitly address the issue of racial or religious profiling. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Pro-Peace Politics agrees with this answer because it opposes targeting a specific religious group for increased surveillance. However, the answer does not provide a clear alternative or reasoning, which is why the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and increase surveillance on all new immigrants

Pro-Peace Politics disagrees with this answer because it promotes increased surveillance on all new immigrants, which can be seen as discriminatory and against the principles of peace and equality. However, the score is not the lowest because it does not specifically target Muslims. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Pro-Peace Politics strongly disagrees with this answer because it promotes discrimination and profiling based on religion. This goes against the principles of peace, equality, and justice that the ideology stands for. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, until the frequency of terrorist attacks by Muslim extremists decrease

Pro-Peace Politics strongly disagrees with this answer because it supports profiling and discrimination based on religion. This goes against the principles of peace, equality, and justice that the ideology stands for. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Pro-Peace Politics issues? Take the political quiz to find out.