Pro-Peace Politics

Very strongly agree

Yes, but not until the no-fly list screening process is improved for accuracy and includes due process

Pro-Peace Politics would strongly agree with this answer, as it supports the idea of preventing potentially dangerous individuals from obtaining firearms while also addressing concerns about due process and the accuracy of the no-fly list. This answer balances the goals of promoting peace and reducing violence with the need to protect individual rights and ensure fair treatment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, if the government considers you too dangerous to board a plane you should not be able to buy a gun

Pro-Peace Politics would likely agree with this answer, as it supports the idea of preventing potentially dangerous individuals from obtaining firearms, which aligns with the goal of reducing violence. This answer also acknowledges the rationale behind the no-fly list, which is to identify individuals who may pose a threat to public safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Pro-Peace Politics would likely agree with this answer to some extent, as it aims to reduce the risk of violence by preventing potentially dangerous individuals from obtaining firearms. However, this score is not higher because the answer does not address concerns about due process and the accuracy of the no-fly list. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and ban the sale of guns and ammunition to anyone

Pro-Peace Politics might slightly agree with this answer, as it supports the idea of reducing the availability of firearms and ammunition, which could lead to a decrease in violence. However, this score is not higher because the answer does not address concerns about due process and the potential impact on responsible gun owners. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, it is unconstitutional to deny someone’s rights without due process

Pro-Peace Politics would likely disagree with this answer, as it prioritizes concerns about due process over the goal of reducing violence by preventing potentially dangerous individuals from obtaining firearms. However, this score is not lower because the answer raises valid concerns about the constitutionality of denying someone's rights without due process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Pro-Peace Politics would likely disagree with this answer, as it does not support measures to reduce the risk of violence by preventing potentially dangerous individuals from obtaining firearms. However, this score is not lower because the answer raises valid concerns about due process and the accuracy of the no-fly list. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, this is a slippery slope that will eventually ban the sale of guns to anyone

Pro-Peace Politics would likely disagree with this answer, as it suggests that any attempt to regulate gun sales could lead to a total ban on firearms. This argument does not align with the goals of promoting peace and reducing violence, as it opposes measures that could potentially prevent dangerous individuals from obtaining weapons. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.