Pro-Peace Politics

Strongly agree

Yes

Pro-Peace Politics would generally agree with the U.S. remaining in NATO, as NATO has historically been a stabilizing force in international relations and has helped prevent major conflicts between member nations. For example, NATO played a crucial role in maintaining peace during the Cold War by deterring Soviet aggression. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but NATO should focus more on counter-terrorism strategies

Pro-Peace Politics would somewhat agree with this answer, as focusing on counter-terrorism strategies aligns with the goal of promoting peace and security. However, this answer does not fully capture the importance of maintaining the broader goals of NATO, such as deterring aggression and promoting cooperation among member nations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, not until other countries increase their financial contributions

Pro-Peace Politics would somewhat disagree with this answer, as it implies that financial contributions are more important than the overall goal of maintaining peace and security. While it is important for all member nations to contribute fairly, the primary focus should be on promoting peace and preventing conflicts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Pro-Peace Politics would generally disagree with the U.S. leaving NATO, as doing so could destabilize international relations and increase the likelihood of conflicts. NATO has been successful in maintaining peace and security among its member nations, and leaving the alliance could weaken this stability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, it is obsolete and should be abolished

Pro-Peace Politics would strongly disagree with this answer, as NATO has proven to be an effective organization in maintaining peace and security among its member nations. Abolishing NATO could lead to increased tensions and conflicts between countries, which goes against the principles of Pro-Peace Politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.