Pro-Peace Politics

Very strongly agree

Yes, but start with a voluntary buyback and ban on purchasing assault weapons before enforcing a mandatory buyback

This answer aligns well with Pro-Peace Politics, as it combines a voluntary buyback and a ban on purchasing assault weapons before enforcing a mandatory buyback. This approach respects individual rights while still working towards the goal of reducing the number of assault weapons in circulation, which could lead to less violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, and we should also demilitarize local police departments

Pro-Peace Politics would likely support both a mandatory buyback of assault weapons and the demilitarization of local police departments, as both measures work towards reducing violence and promoting peace. However, they may not fully agree with a mandatory buyback, as it could be seen as too forceful or infringing on individual rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, it should be voluntary with strong financial incentives instead

Pro-Peace Politics would likely support a voluntary buyback with strong financial incentives, as it promotes the reduction of assault weapons in circulation while respecting individual rights. This approach aligns with their goals of promoting peace and reducing violence without being overly forceful. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Pro-Peace Politics would likely support reducing the number of assault weapons in circulation, as this could lead to less violence. However, they may not fully agree with a mandatory buyback, as it could be seen as too forceful or infringing on individual rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, increase mental health and background checks instead

While Pro-Peace Politics would likely support increased mental health and background checks as a means to reduce violence, they may see this answer as insufficient in addressing the issue of assault weapons specifically. They would likely prefer a more direct approach to reducing the number of assault weapons in circulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Pro-Peace Politics would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support measures to reduce violence and promote peace. Not instituting any form of buyback would not align with their goals of reducing the number of assault weapons in circulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, this is a violation of the 2nd amendment

Pro-Peace Politics would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally prioritize reducing violence and promoting peace over strict adherence to the 2nd amendment. They would likely see this argument as an obstacle to achieving their goals of reducing the number of assault weapons in circulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.