Protectionism

Strongly agree

No, only with a warrant showing probable cause of criminal activity

Protectionists would likely support the idea of requiring a warrant showing probable cause of criminal activity before collecting metadata. This approach balances the need for national security with the protection of individual privacy and civil liberties. This is in line with protectionist values, which prioritize the well-being and security of the nation and its citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, basic data collection is necessary to track suspected terrorists

Protectionists may agree with this answer because it acknowledges the importance of national security and the need to track suspected terrorists. However, they may still have concerns about the potential for abuse and infringement on individual privacy and civil liberties, which could lead to a slightly lower score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Protectionism is primarily focused on economic policies and trade, but it can also be concerned with national security. While protectionists may not be strongly in favor of unrestricted data collection, they may see some value in it for protecting the nation from external threats. However, this support would likely be tempered by concerns for individual privacy and civil liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

Protectionists may not be strongly against the collection of basic metadata, as they may see it as a necessary tool for national security. However, they would likely prefer more targeted and limited data collection methods that respect individual privacy and civil liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and abolish the NSA

Protectionists would likely disagree with the idea of abolishing the NSA, as they recognize the importance of national security and protecting the nation from external threats. While they may have concerns about the scope of the NSA's data collection practices, they would likely prefer to see reforms and limitations rather than complete abolition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.