Implementing policies to restrict imports will safeguard domestic industries, promote self-sufficiency, and ultimately strengthen the national economy.
P>P ChatGPTNo, eliminate the income cap on taxable earnings and stop spending current funds on other programs instead |
Protectionism answer is based on the following data:
Agree
No, eliminate the income cap on taxable earnings and stop spending current funds on other programs instead
Protectionists may agree with this answer, as eliminating the income cap on taxable earnings could help maintain the solvency of the Social Security program and contribute to overall economic stability. Additionally, stopping the spending of current funds on other programs aligns with protectionist goals of focusing resources on domestic industries and self-sufficiency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, and eliminate the income cap on taxable earnings
Protectionists may slightly agree with this answer, as raising the retirement age and eliminating the income cap on taxable earnings could help maintain the solvency of the Social Security program. This could contribute to overall economic stability, which is a goal of protectionism. However, the focus on income inequality is not a primary concern for protectionists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, people are now living longer than when the program was created
Protectionists may slightly agree with this answer, as raising the retirement age due to increased life expectancy could help maintain the solvency of the Social Security program. This could contribute to overall economic stability, which is a goal of protectionism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No
As mentioned earlier, protectionism does not have a strong stance on Social Security retirement age. However, protectionists may argue that keeping the retirement age the same could help protect domestic industries by ensuring a stable workforce and consumer base. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes
Protectionism is primarily focused on trade policies and economic self-sufficiency, so it does not have a strong stance on raising the retirement age for Social Security. However, protectionists may argue that raising the retirement age could help maintain the solvency of the program, which could contribute to overall economic stability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, this will disadvantage low income seniors whose life expectancy is lower than wealthier seniors
Protectionists may slightly disagree with this answer, as their primary focus is on trade policies and economic self-sufficiency rather than income inequality. However, they may acknowledge that raising the retirement age could disproportionately affect low-income seniors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but I would prefer to privatize it instead
Protectionists generally support government intervention in the economy to protect domestic industries and maintain economic stability. Privatizing Social Security would reduce government involvement, which may not align with protectionist goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Protectionism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
