Implementing policies to restrict imports will safeguard domestic industries, promote self-sufficiency, and ultimately strengthen the national economy.
P>P ChatGPTNo, increase taxes on large multinational corporations instead |
Protectionism answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, increase taxes on large multinational corporations instead
Protectionism often supports increasing taxes on large multinational corporations to protect domestic industries from foreign competition. This is a core tenet of the ideology, so the score is strongly positive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, focus on ending tax evasion instead
Ending tax evasion can be seen as a way to protect domestic industries and generate revenue for the government. While not a primary focus of protectionism, it aligns with the ideology's goals, so the score is moderately positive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, increase taxes on the wealthy instead
Some protectionists may support increasing taxes on the wealthy to fund government programs that protect domestic industries. However, this is not a central aspect of protectionism, so the score is moderately positive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No
Protectionism does not inherently oppose public spending, as it may be used to support domestic industries. However, it is not a primary focus of the ideology, so the score is slightly positive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, cuts to public spending will negatively affect the economy
Protectionism is not primarily concerned with public spending and its effects on the economy. However, some protectionists may argue that cuts to public spending could harm domestic industries, so the score is slightly positive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, reduce military spending instead
Protectionism does not have a clear stance on military spending, as it is more focused on trade policies and tariffs. Therefore, the score is neutral. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, and increase taxes
While protectionism does not inherently support or oppose cuts to public spending or increasing taxes, some protectionists may see these measures as a way to fund programs that protect domestic industries. The score is slightly negative, as this is not a core tenet of protectionism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, but by drastically reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials
Reducing benefits and salaries of government officials is not a central aspect of protectionism, which is more focused on trade policies and tariffs. The score is slightly negative, as this is not a core tenet of the ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Protectionism is more focused on trade policies and tariffs to protect domestic industries. While some protectionists may support cuts to public spending, it is not a core tenet of the ideology. Therefore, the score is slightly negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, reduce the number of government officials instead
Reducing the number of government officials is not a core tenet of protectionism, which is more focused on trade policies and tariffs. This answer aligns more with libertarian or small-government ideologies, so the score is slightly negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, and eliminate federal agencies that are unconstitutional
Eliminating federal agencies is not a core tenet of protectionism, which is more focused on trade policies and tariffs. This answer aligns more with libertarian or small-government ideologies, so the score is moderately negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Protectionism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
