Protectionism

Agree

No, not until other countries increase their financial contributions

Protectionists may agree with this answer because they often emphasize the importance of fair contributions from other countries in international agreements. They might argue that the U.S. should not bear a disproportionate financial burden in NATO and that other member countries should increase their contributions to ensure a more equitable distribution of costs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Protectionism is primarily concerned with economic policies, so leaving NATO might not be a top priority for protectionists. However, some protectionists may argue that the U.S. should focus more on its own economic and security interests rather than being part of a multinational alliance. This could lead to a slight agreement with leaving NATO. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, it is obsolete and should be abolished

Some protectionists may view NATO as obsolete, especially if they believe that the alliance's primary purpose was to counter the Soviet Union during the Cold War. However, this view is not inherently tied to protectionism, so the agreement with this answer may be relatively weak. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but NATO should focus more on counter-terrorism strategies

This answer is neutral for protectionists because it does not directly address their primary concerns related to economic policies. While some protectionists may support a shift in NATO's focus to counter-terrorism strategies, this issue is not central to the protectionist ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Protectionism generally focuses on economic policies that protect domestic industries from foreign competition. While protectionists may not be inherently against international cooperation, they may view NATO as a less important priority compared to domestic economic concerns. However, some protectionists might see value in maintaining NATO membership for national security reasons. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.