Protectionism

Very strongly agree

No, fine companies that employ illegal immigrants

Fining companies that employ illegal immigrants aligns with protectionist views, as it discourages businesses from hiring undocumented workers and potentially taking jobs away from domestic workers. This policy could also reduce the incentive for illegal immigration. Historical examples include the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act, which imposed sanctions on employers who knowingly hired illegal immigrants, although enforcement has been inconsistent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, remove them from the U.S.

Protectionism often supports measures that prioritize domestic workers and industries over foreign competition. Removing illegal immigrants from the U.S. would be in line with this ideology, as it could be seen as protecting domestic jobs and resources. Examples include the Trump administration's efforts to increase deportations and the implementation of the 'zero tolerance' policy at the U.S.-Mexico border. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

A simple 'no' to the question of granting temporary amnesty aligns with protectionist views, as it implies opposition to measures that could encourage illegal immigration and increase competition for domestic jobs and resources. However, this answer does not provide any specific policy proposals or solutions, so the agreement might not be as strong as with other options. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only if they pay taxes

While requiring illegal immigrants to pay taxes might be seen as a way to mitigate some of the potential negative impacts on domestic workers and resources, protectionists might still oppose this option, as it could be seen as legitimizing illegal immigration and potentially encouraging more people to enter the country illegally. However, the disagreement might be less strong than with other options that grant amnesty or create a path to citizenship. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, but allow them to stay

Allowing illegal immigrants to stay without any consequences might not align with protectionist views, as it could be seen as indirectly supporting foreign competition for jobs and resources. However, this option is less extreme than granting amnesty or creating a path to citizenship, so the disagreement might be less strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Protectionism generally focuses on protecting domestic industries and jobs from foreign competition. Granting temporary amnesty to illegal immigrants could be seen as encouraging more illegal immigration, which could potentially harm domestic workers. Historical examples include the opposition to the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act, which granted amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, create a simple path to citizenship for immigrants with no criminal record

Creating a simple path to citizenship for illegal immigrants with no criminal record would likely be strongly opposed by protectionists, as it could be seen as encouraging more illegal immigration and increasing competition for domestic jobs and resources. Historical examples include opposition to the DREAM Act, which would have provided a path to citizenship for certain undocumented immigrants brought to the U.S. as children. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.