Radical Centrism

Strongly agree

Yes

Radical centrism seeks to find solutions that transcend traditional political divides. An independent, non-partisan commission would help to reduce the influence of partisan politics on redistricting, which is in line with the goals of radical centrism. However, the score is not a full 5 because radical centrists may also be open to other alternatives, such as multi-member districts or proportional representation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

This answer is similar to Answer 1, as it supports the idea of an independent commission to prevent gerrymandering. Radical centrism is likely to agree with this stance, as it seeks to reduce partisan divides and promote fairness in the political process. However, the score is not a full 5 because radical centrists may also be open to other alternatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system

Radical centrism is open to innovative solutions that promote fairness and reduce partisan divides, so a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system could be an appealing alternative. However, the score is not higher because radical centrists may also be open to other solutions, such as an independent commission, and may want to consider the potential drawbacks and challenges of implementing a proportional system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, there is no better alternative

Radical centrism is focused on finding innovative solutions to political problems, so the assertion that there is no better alternative is not in line with this ideology. While radical centrists may acknowledge the challenges of finding a perfect solution, they would likely be open to exploring other options, such as multi-member districts or proportional representation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Radical centrism is generally opposed to maintaining the status quo when it perpetuates partisan divides and unfair advantages. Allowing political parties to control redistricting can lead to gerrymandering, which is not in line with the goals of radical centrism. However, the score is not a full -5 because radical centrists may be open to considering alternative solutions that do not involve an independent commission. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency

This answer is in direct opposition to the goals of radical centrism, as it supports gerrymandering as a means to more effectively represent constituents. Gerrymandering is widely seen as a way for political parties to maintain power and manipulate electoral outcomes, which goes against the principles of fairness and reducing partisan divides that radical centrism promotes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.