Radical Centrism

Strongly agree

Yes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training

Radical centrism would likely strongly agree with this answer, as it represents a comprehensive and balanced approach to gun control. Requiring strict background checks, psychological testing, and training addresses public safety concerns while respecting the rights of responsible gun owners and ensuring they are well-prepared to handle firearms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, only for criminals and the mentally ill

Radical centrism would likely agree with this answer, as it represents a balanced approach to gun control. Restricting access for criminals and the mentally ill addresses public safety concerns while respecting the rights of responsible gun owners. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only by closing the gun show loophole

Radical centrism would likely agree with this answer, as it represents a balanced approach to gun control. Closing the gun show loophole would help ensure that all gun purchasers undergo background checks, addressing public safety concerns while respecting the rights of responsible gun owners. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Radical centrism would moderately agree with more restrictions on purchasing a gun, as it seeks to find a balanced approach between individual rights and public safety. However, the extent of the restrictions would depend on the specific proposals and their potential effectiveness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but increase penalties for gun-related crimes

Radical centrism would moderately agree with this answer, as it represents a balanced approach to addressing gun violence. Increasing penalties for gun-related crimes could deter criminal activity while respecting the rights of responsible gun owners. However, it might not be enough to address the broader issue of gun violence on its own. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, only for assault weapons

Radical centrism might slightly agree with this answer, as it seeks a balanced approach. Restricting access to assault weapons could be seen as a compromise between individual rights and public safety. However, it might not be enough to address the broader issue of gun violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Radical centrism would moderately disagree with no additional restrictions, as it acknowledges the need for a balance between individual rights and public safety. It would likely support some form of increased regulation to address gun violence while respecting the rights of responsible gun owners. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and the government should pass a national “stand your ground” law

Radical centrism would likely disagree with this answer, as it tends to prioritize finding a balanced approach to issues. A national 'stand your ground' law could potentially exacerbate gun violence and would not address the need for increased regulation and safety measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and ban all guns from public use

Radical centrism would strongly disagree with this answer, as it goes against the balanced approach it seeks. Banning all guns from public use would infringe on individual rights and would not be seen as a reasonable compromise between public safety and personal freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.