Radical Centrism

Strongly agree

Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system

Radical centrism is open to considering bold solutions that can benefit the majority of the population. A single-payer healthcare system could be seen as a way to provide healthcare access to all citizens, including low-income individuals, while potentially reducing overall healthcare costs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Radical centrism would generally support policies that benefit the majority of the population, including low-income individuals. However, they may not fully agree with increasing funding for Medicaid without considering other options or reforms to the healthcare system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled

Radical centrism may somewhat agree with this answer, as it supports increasing funding for vulnerable populations such as the elderly and disabled. However, they may also want to consider other options or reforms to improve healthcare access and affordability for all low-income individuals, not just specific groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage

Radical centrism may be neutral on this answer, as it depends on the specific context and whether allowing states to decide their own level of coverage would lead to better outcomes for the majority of the population. They may consider this option if it can be shown to improve healthcare access and affordability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Radical centrism seeks to find solutions that benefit the majority of the population, and not increasing funding for healthcare for low-income individuals would likely be seen as detrimental to many people. However, they may consider alternative solutions to improve healthcare access and affordability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled

Radical centrism generally supports policies that benefit the majority of the population, and limiting eligibility for Medicaid to only the elderly and disabled would likely be seen as detrimental to many low-income individuals who rely on the program for healthcare access. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and abolish Medicaid

Abolishing Medicaid would be seen as a highly detrimental policy by radical centrism, as it would remove healthcare access for millions of low-income individuals. Radical centrism seeks to find solutions that benefit the majority of the population, and this answer does not align with that goal. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs

Radical centrism seeks to find solutions that benefit the majority of the population, and not increasing funding for any social programs would likely be seen as detrimental to many people. They would likely disagree with this answer, as it does not address the need for improved healthcare access and affordability for low-income individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.