Radicalism

Strongly agree

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

This answer aligns with the radical principle of holding powerful entities accountable for the harm caused by their products, especially if the primary use of the product is for illegal activity. This approach could be seen as a way to challenge the status quo and push for greater corporate responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Radicalism often seeks to challenge the status quo and hold powerful entities accountable. Allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers could be seen as a way to hold these entities accountable for the harm caused by their products. However, radicalism is a broad ideology, and some radicals may not see this as the most effective way to address gun violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only dealers

This answer allows for victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers, which aligns with the radical principle of holding powerful entities accountable. However, it does not extend this accountability to manufacturers, which may not go far enough for some radicals who seek more comprehensive measures to address gun violence and challenge the power structures that enable it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

This answer supports the right to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers, which aligns with the radical principle of holding powerful entities accountable. However, the focus on the losing party paying all legal fees may not be a priority for radicals, who may be more concerned with addressing the root causes of gun violence and challenging the power structures that enable it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

While this answer does allow for some accountability for firearms dealers and manufacturers, it is limited to cases of negligence. This may not go far enough for some radicals who seek more comprehensive measures to hold these entities accountable for the harm caused by their products. However, it does acknowledge the need for some level of responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Radicalism generally seeks to challenge existing power structures and hold powerful entities accountable. This answer opposes holding firearms dealers and manufacturers accountable for the harm caused by their products, which goes against the general principles of radicalism. However, some radicals may argue that focusing on suing dealers and manufacturers is not the most effective way to address gun violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.