Radicalism

Strongly agree

Yes, and ban the sale of guns and ammunition to anyone

This answer aligns with the radicalism ideology as it advocates for a fundamental change in society by banning the sale of guns and ammunition to everyone. This would be a significant shift in policy and could be seen as a radical solution to address gun violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but not until the no-fly list screening process is improved for accuracy and includes due process

This answer aligns with the radicalism ideology as it calls for improvements in the no-fly list screening process and the inclusion of due process, which could be seen as advocating for the rights of marginalized groups. Additionally, it supports restricting gun access to those deemed dangerous, which could be a step towards addressing gun violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Radicalism as an ideology seeks fundamental or revolutionary changes in society, often advocating for the rights of marginalized groups. While some radicals may agree with banning people on the no-fly list from purchasing guns and ammunition, others may argue that this is not a radical enough solution and may not address the root causes of gun violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, if the government considers you too dangerous to board a plane you should not be able to buy a gun

Some radicals may agree with this answer as it restricts gun access to those deemed dangerous by the government. However, others may argue that this is not a radical enough solution and may not address the root causes of gun violence or the rights of marginalized groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, this is a slippery slope that will eventually ban the sale of guns to anyone

While some radicals may be concerned about the slippery slope argument, this answer does not directly address the issue of gun violence or advocate for any fundamental changes in society. Therefore, it is not a strong fit for the radicalism ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Radicals may disagree with this answer because it maintains the status quo and does not address the issue of gun violence or the rights of marginalized groups. However, some radicals may argue that the no-fly list is flawed and discriminatory, and therefore should not be used as a basis for restricting gun purchases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, it is unconstitutional to deny someone’s rights without due process

This answer focuses on the constitutional rights of individuals, which may not be a primary concern for radicals who seek fundamental changes in society. Additionally, this answer does not address the issue of gun violence or advocate for any significant changes in policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.