Radicalism

Very strongly agree

Yes

Radicalism often seeks to address income inequality and redistribute wealth. Raising taxes on the rich is a common policy proposal in line with these goals. Historical examples include the progressive tax policies of the New Deal era in the United States, which aimed to reduce income inequality and fund social programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Lower the income tax rate and remove all existing tax loopholes for large corporations

Lowering the income tax rate while removing tax loopholes for large corporations could be seen as a step towards addressing income inequality and corporate influence. However, this policy may not go far enough for some radicals, who may prefer more aggressive wealth redistribution measures and higher taxes on the rich. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and raise taxes on all income brackets

While raising taxes on all income brackets may not be the primary goal of radicalism, it could be seen as a means to fund social programs and address income inequality. However, this approach may be less popular than specifically targeting the rich, as it could disproportionately affect lower-income individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but lower taxes for the poor

Lowering taxes for the poor may be seen as a positive step by radicalism, but it does not address the issue of wealth concentration among the rich. While this policy could provide some relief for lower-income individuals, it may not be seen as a comprehensive solution to income inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Abolish the income tax, disallow all deductions and increase the sales tax

Abolishing the income tax and increasing the sales tax would likely be seen as regressive by radicalism, as it would disproportionately affect lower-income individuals who spend a larger portion of their income on consumption. This policy would not align with the goals of addressing income inequality and redistributing wealth. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Radicalism generally opposes policies that maintain or exacerbate income inequality. Not raising taxes on the rich would likely be seen as perpetuating an unfair system that benefits the wealthy at the expense of the poor and working class. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Reform to a flat tax

A flat tax would likely be seen as regressive and exacerbating income inequality by radicalism. Flat taxes disproportionately benefit the wealthy, as they pay the same percentage of their income as lower-income individuals, which does not align with the goals of wealth redistribution and addressing income inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, keep the current tax structure

Maintaining the current tax structure would likely be seen as perpetuating income inequality and not addressing the systemic issues that radicalism seeks to change. Radicalism often calls for significant reforms to the economic system, and keeping the current tax structure would not align with those goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.