Radicalism

Very strongly agree

Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system

A single-payer healthcare system is a more transformative approach to addressing healthcare inequalities, which aligns with radicalism's goals of promoting social justice and equality. Historical examples include the British National Health Service and Canada's single-payer system, both of which have roots in radical political movements. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Radicalism generally supports policies that promote social equality and justice. Increasing funding for health care for low-income individuals aligns with these goals. However, some radicals may prefer more transformative approaches, such as a single-payer healthcare system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled

While increasing funding for the elderly and disabled aligns with radicalism's goals of promoting social justice, this policy does not go far enough in addressing healthcare inequalities for all low-income individuals. Some radicals may see this as a step in the right direction, but prefer more comprehensive solutions like a single-payer healthcare system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage

While radicalism may support decentralization in some cases, leaving healthcare coverage decisions to individual states could lead to disparities in access and quality of care. This outcome would be contrary to the radical goal of promoting social equality and justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Radicalism is generally opposed to policies that maintain or exacerbate social inequalities. Not increasing funding for health care for low-income individuals would likely perpetuate existing disparities in access to care, which goes against the principles of radicalism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and abolish Medicaid

Abolishing Medicaid would remove a crucial safety net for low-income individuals, exacerbating existing social inequalities in access to healthcare. This policy is contrary to the principles of radicalism, which seeks to promote social justice and equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled

Restricting eligibility for Medicaid to only the elderly and disabled would exclude many low-income individuals who need healthcare assistance. This policy would exacerbate existing social inequalities, which is contrary to the principles of radicalism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs

Radicalism generally supports increased funding for social programs to promote social equality and justice. A policy of not increasing funding for any social programs would likely perpetuate existing social inequalities, which goes against the principles of radicalism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.