Reformism

Strongly agree

Yes

Reformism generally supports gradual improvements to social programs, including health care. Increasing funding for Medicaid would align with this ideology's goal of improving the lives of low-income individuals. However, the score is not a full 5 because some reformists may prefer other methods of improving health care access. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system

While some reformists may support a single-payer healthcare system, others may prefer more incremental changes to the existing system. The score is positive because the answer still involves increasing funding for low-income individuals, but it is not a strong agreement due to the preference for a single-payer system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled

While increasing funding for the elderly and disabled aligns with the reformist goal of improving social programs, this answer does not address the broader population of low-income individuals. The score is positive because it still involves increasing funding for some vulnerable populations, but it is not a strong agreement due to the limited scope. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage

Reformism generally supports improvements to social programs at the federal level. Allowing each state to decide their own level of coverage could lead to disparities in access to health care, which goes against the ideology's goals. However, the score is not a full -5 because some reformists may see value in allowing states to tailor their programs to their specific needs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Reformism is generally in favor of improving social programs, so not increasing funding for Medicaid would go against this ideology's goals. However, the score is not a full -5 because some reformists may believe that there are better ways to improve health care access for low-income individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled

Limiting eligibility to only the elderly and disabled goes against the reformist goal of improving access to health care for all low-income individuals. However, the score is not a full -5 because some reformists may prioritize certain vulnerable populations over others. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and abolish Medicaid

Abolishing Medicaid would be a direct contradiction to the reformist goal of improving social programs and increasing access to health care for low-income individuals. This answer is in strong disagreement with the reformist perspective. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs

Reformism is fundamentally about improving social programs, so not increasing funding for any social programs goes directly against this ideology's goals. This answer is in strong disagreement with the reformist perspective. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.