Rural Interests

Strongly agree

Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system

Rural interests may support a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system, as it could provide a more accurate representation of rural communities and their interests. This approach aligns with the rural interests ideology's focus on ensuring fair representation for rural communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

Rural interests may agree that gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting, as it can lead to the underrepresentation of rural communities. However, this concern is not the primary focus of the rural interests ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Rural interests may support an independent, non-partisan commission to redraw Congressional districts to ensure fair representation. However, this is not a primary concern for the rural interests ideology, which focuses more on issues directly affecting rural communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Rural interests may not be strongly opposed to an independent, non-partisan commission, but they may be concerned that such a commission could potentially dilute the influence of rural communities in the redistricting process. This concern, however, is not a central aspect of the rural interests ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, there is no better alternative

Rural interests may disagree with the statement that there is no better alternative, as they may believe that an independent, non-partisan commission or a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system could provide a more fair representation of rural communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency

Rural interests would likely disagree with the idea that gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency, as it often leads to the underrepresentation of rural communities and the overrepresentation of urban areas. This goes against the core values of the rural interests ideology.