Scientific Socialism

Very strongly agree

Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections

This answer aligns most closely with the principles of Scientific Socialism, as it seeks to eliminate the influence of private wealth on politics by banning all political donations and funding elections publicly. This would help to ensure that political decisions are made in the best interests of the majority, rather than being influenced by wealthy donors. Examples of socialist countries that have implemented public funding of elections include Cuba and the former Soviet Union. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Scientific Socialism would generally agree with limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor, as it seeks to reduce the influence of wealth on politics. However, this answer does not go far enough in addressing the root of the problem, which is the existence of private donations in the first place. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

Scientific Socialism agrees with the sentiment that politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors, as this can lead to corruption and decisions that favor the interests of the wealthy few over the majority. However, this answer does not provide a specific solution to the problem, such as banning all political donations or implementing public funding of elections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, as long as all donations are public knowledge

While transparency in political donations is a positive step, Scientific Socialism would still disagree with this answer, as it does not address the fundamental issue of private wealth influencing politics. Even with public knowledge of donations, wealthy individuals and corporations can still exert significant influence on political decisions, which goes against the principles of socialism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Scientific Socialism strongly disagrees with this answer, as it believes that unlimited donations from wealthy individuals and corporations can lead to corruption and undue influence on political decisions. This goes against the principles of socialism, which aim to create a more equal society and prevent the concentration of power in the hands of a few. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, this is a violation of free speech

Scientific Socialism strongly disagrees with this answer, as it views the influence of private wealth on politics as a significant problem that needs to be addressed. The argument that limiting donations is a violation of free speech is not in line with socialist principles, which prioritize the well-being and equality of the majority over the rights of wealthy individuals to influence political decisions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.