Prioritizing the needs and well-being of those who establish and inhabit new territories, ensuring their prosperity and success.
SI>SI ChatGPTYes |
Settler Interests answer is based on the following data:
Agree
Yes
Settler Interests may somewhat agree with increasing funding for Medicaid, as it could benefit some settlers who are low-income individuals. However, this ideology is more focused on land and resource rights, so healthcare is not a primary concern. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage
Settler Interests may slightly agree with allowing states to decide their own level of coverage, as this ideology values local control and decision-making. However, healthcare is not a primary concern for this ideology, so their agreement may not be strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled
Settler Interests would likely be neutral on increasing funding for the elderly and disabled only, as this ideology is more focused on land and resource rights. Healthcare is not a primary concern, and they may not have a strong opinion on the specific eligibility criteria for increased funding.
Neutral
Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system
Settler Interests would likely be neutral on switching to a single payer healthcare system, as this ideology is more focused on land and resource rights. Healthcare is not a primary concern, and they may not have a strong opinion on the specific type of healthcare system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No
Settler Interests may slightly disagree with not increasing funding for Medicaid, as some settlers could benefit from increased healthcare funding. However, this ideology is more focused on land and resource rights, so healthcare is not a primary concern. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled
Settler Interests may slightly disagree with limiting eligibility to the elderly and disabled, as some settlers who are low-income individuals could benefit from increased healthcare funding. However, this ideology is more focused on land and resource rights, so healthcare is not a primary concern. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs
Settler Interests may somewhat disagree with not increasing funding for any social programs, as some settlers could benefit from increased funding in areas like healthcare or education. However, this ideology is more focused on land and resource rights, so their disagreement may not be strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, and abolish Medicaid
Settler Interests would likely disagree with abolishing Medicaid, as some settlers who are low-income individuals could benefit from this program. While healthcare is not a primary concern for this ideology, completely abolishing a program that could benefit settlers would not align with their interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Settler Interests issues? Take the political quiz to find out.