Social Conservatism

Very strongly agree

No, kids should be raised to be racially color blind instead of being taught they are inherently racist or disadvantaged based on the color of their skin

This answer aligns with social conservatism's emphasis on traditional values and a unified national identity. Social conservatives would likely argue that teaching children to be racially colorblind promotes equality and unity, rather than focusing on racial divisions and potential biases. This approach is more in line with the social conservative belief in the importance of shared values and history. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Social conservatives would likely agree with not teaching critical race theory in K-12 education, as they tend to prioritize traditional values and a unified national identity. They may argue that critical race theory could create unnecessary divisions and tensions among students, and that it is more important to teach about shared values and history. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but not until they are teenagers

While this answer suggests delaying the introduction of critical race theory until students are older, social conservatives would still likely disagree with its inclusion in the curriculum. They may argue that even as teenagers, students should focus on shared values and history rather than divisive narratives that could create tensions among their peers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Social conservatism generally emphasizes traditional values and institutions. Teaching critical race theory in K-12 education may be seen as promoting a divisive narrative that goes against the values of unity and equality. Social conservatives may argue that it is more important to focus on shared values and history rather than highlighting racial divisions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and also add Intersectionality and the 1619 Project to the curriculum

This answer goes even further than simply teaching critical race theory, by also including intersectionality and the 1619 Project. Social conservatives would strongly disagree with this approach, as it would be seen as promoting divisive narratives and undermining traditional values and a unified national identity. They would likely argue that such an approach would only serve to create tensions and divisions among students. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, we cannot end racism until we acknowledge that our institutions, laws, and history are inherently racist

Social conservatives would strongly disagree with this answer, as it directly contradicts their emphasis on traditional values and a unified national identity. They would likely argue that focusing on the inherent racism of institutions, laws, and history would only serve to divide people and undermine the importance of shared values and history. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.