Social Conservatism

Very strongly agree

No, foreign interests should not be able to buy the influence of our politicians

This answer aligns strongly with social conservatism's emphasis on national sovereignty and the protection of American values. Social conservatives would argue that foreign interests should not be able to buy the influence of American politicians, as this could lead to policies that prioritize foreign interests over the needs of American citizens. This sentiment can be seen in the opposition to globalist policies and international trade agreements, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which some social conservatives argue has harmed American workers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Social conservatives would likely agree with this answer because they tend to prioritize national sovereignty and the protection of American values. By not allowing foreign lobbyists to raise money for American elections, they can help ensure that domestic politics remain focused on the needs and interests of American citizens. For example, social conservatives have often been critical of international organizations like the United Nations, arguing that they can undermine national sovereignty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as all donations are public knowledge to ensure there is no conflict of interest

While transparency is generally valued by social conservatives, they would likely still be concerned about the potential influence of foreign interests on American politics, even if all donations are public knowledge. The potential for conflicts of interest and the erosion of national sovereignty would still be present, and social conservatives would likely prefer to focus on limiting foreign influence altogether rather than simply making it more transparent. However, the emphasis on transparency might somewhat mitigate their opposition to this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Social conservatism generally emphasizes the importance of national identity and cultural cohesion. Allowing foreign lobbyists to raise money for American elections could be seen as a threat to these values, as it may lead to the influence of foreign interests on domestic politics. Historically, social conservatives have been wary of foreign influence, such as during the Cold War when they opposed communist infiltration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.