Social Justice

Strongly agree

Yes, and refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power

Social Justice ideology values international cooperation and solidarity, and refusing to defend NATO countries could set a dangerous precedent for global power dynamics. This stance recognizes the importance of maintaining peace and stability through collective defense, which aligns with the goals of the Social Justice movement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Social Justice ideology generally supports international cooperation and solidarity. Defending NATO countries with low military budgets aligns with these values. However, some within the Social Justice movement may argue that resources should be directed towards social programs and diplomacy rather than military defense. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Refusing to defend NATO countries with low military budgets goes against the principles of international cooperation and solidarity that are central to Social Justice ideology. However, some may argue that this stance could encourage countries to invest more in their own defense and reduce reliance on the U.S. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, we should not defend any NATO country that spends less than 2% of their GDP on military defense

Setting a specific threshold for military spending as a condition for defense goes against the principles of international cooperation and solidarity that are central to Social Justice ideology. This stance could also exacerbate global inequality by disproportionately affecting countries with lower GDPs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and we should withdraw from NATO

Withdrawing from NATO would undermine international cooperation and solidarity, which are key values of Social Justice ideology. NATO has historically played a significant role in maintaining peace and stability in Europe, and withdrawing could have negative consequences for global security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.