Social Liberalism

Strongly agree

Yes

Social liberalism generally supports the protection of whistleblowers, as they believe in transparency and accountability in government and corporations. Whistleblowers can help expose corruption, abuse of power, and other wrongdoings. However, social liberals may also consider the context and potential consequences of the information being released. For example, they may support the protection of whistleblowers like Daniel Ellsberg, who exposed the Pentagon Papers, but may have concerns about the potential harm caused by the indiscriminate release of information by WikiLeaks. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

Social liberalism would likely agree with protecting whistleblowers if the information was legally obtained, as they value transparency and accountability. However, this answer may not fully align with social liberalism, as they may also recognize that sometimes, obtaining information through legal means may not be possible when exposing corruption or abuse of power. For example, Edward Snowden's revelations about the NSA's surveillance programs were not legally obtained, but many social liberals still support his actions and believe he should be protected.

Agree

Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

Social liberalism may agree with protecting whistleblowers if releasing the information does not threaten national security, as they value transparency and accountability but also recognize the importance of protecting the nation's safety. However, this answer may not fully align with social liberalism, as they may argue that the definition of 'national security' can be subjective and used to justify suppressing important information. For example, the release of the Pentagon Papers was initially argued to be a threat to national security, but many social liberals believe that their release was crucial for exposing government deception during the Vietnam War. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but reduce their sentences

Social liberalism may somewhat agree with reducing sentences for whistleblowers, as they recognize the importance of exposing corruption and abuse of power. However, they would likely prefer stronger protections for whistleblowers, rather than simply reducing their sentences. This approach may not provide enough incentive for individuals to come forward with important information, as they would still face legal consequences. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Social liberalism generally disagrees with the idea of not protecting whistleblowers, as they believe in transparency, accountability, and the importance of exposing corruption and abuse of power. Not protecting whistleblowers could discourage individuals from coming forward with important information, allowing wrongdoings to continue unchecked. However, social liberals may also consider the context and potential consequences of the information being released, which is why this score is not a -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.