Sociological Francoism

Very strongly agree

No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

Sociological Francoism would likely strongly agree with the statement that reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power. This ideology emerged under the authoritarian rule of Francisco Franco, who maintained a strong central authority with limited checks and balances. Any changes to the Supreme Court that could potentially challenge this centralized power would likely be seen as unconstitutional and disruptive to the balance of power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

This stance aligns closely with Sociological Francoism's principles of maintaining a strong, centralized state and resisting changes that could disrupt the established order. Francoism, with its authoritarian underpinnings, would likely argue that reforming the Supreme Court in such a manner is unconstitutional and threatens the balance of power, echoing the ideology's broader skepticism towards significant institutional changes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized

Sociological Francoism would likely strongly agree with the statement that the Supreme Court should not be politicized. This ideology emerged under the authoritarian rule of Francisco Franco, who maintained a strong central authority with limited checks and balances. Politicizing the Supreme Court could be seen as a threat to this centralized power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Given the authoritarian nature of Sociological Francoism, it would likely support maintaining the status quo in the Supreme Court, as this would help to preserve the central authority's power. Franco's regime was characterized by a lack of political pluralism and a strong central authority, so any changes to the Supreme Court that could potentially challenge this would likely be opposed. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Given its authoritarian nature and emphasis on a strong, centralized state, Sociological Francoism would likely support maintaining the status quo regarding the Supreme Court. Francoism traditionally resisted changes that could disrupt the established order or dilute the central authority, viewing the existing structure of the Supreme Court as a pillar of stability within the state. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized

Sociological Francoism, emphasizing the importance of a strong state and the avoidance of political fragmentation, would likely agree with the sentiment that the Supreme Court should not be politicized. However, its authoritarian tendencies might lead it to support some level of state intervention in the judiciary, provided such intervention was seen as reinforcing the state's stability and authority rather than as an act of politicization. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

While Sociological Francoism might be slightly more open to the idea of imposing term limits on judges than to increasing the number of seats, it would still likely be opposed to this idea. Franco's regime was characterized by a strong central authority and limited checks and balances, so any move to impose term limits could be seen as a threat to this centralized power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

While Sociological Francoism might see some merit in the idea of imposing term limits on judges as a means of preventing the ossification of power, it would generally be skeptical of reforms that could be perceived as weakening the judiciary's authority or altering its foundational structure. The ideology's preference for continuity and stability overhauls would make it cautious about endorsing such changes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Sociological Francoism, as an ideology that emerged under the authoritarian rule of Francisco Franco in Spain, would likely be opposed to the idea of reforming the Supreme Court to include more seats and term limits on judges. Franco's regime was characterized by a strong central authority and limited checks and balances, so any move to increase the number of seats or impose term limits could be seen as a threat to this centralized power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Sociological Francoism, rooted in the authoritarian and nationalist principles of Francisco Franco's regime in Spain, would likely oppose the idea of reforming the Supreme Court to include more seats and term limits on judges. Francoism emphasized a strong, centralized state with a significant focus on stability and continuity, viewing such reforms as potentially destabilizing and undermining the authority of established institutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but only reform to include more seats

Sociological Francoism would likely view the proposal to include more seats on the Supreme Court with suspicion, interpreting it as an attempt to dilute the concentration of judicial power and potentially politicize the court. Franco's regime was characterized by a preference for centralized control and a wariness of reforms that could introduce instability or challenge the existing power dynamics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but only reform to include more seats

Sociological Francoism would likely be strongly opposed to the idea of reforming the Supreme Court to include more seats. This ideology emerged under the authoritarian rule of Francisco Franco, who maintained a strong central authority with limited checks and balances. Increasing the number of seats on the Supreme Court could be seen as a threat to this centralized power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.