Sovereigntism

Strongly agree

No, only with a warrant showing probable cause of criminal activity

This answer aligns well with sovereigntism's emphasis on national sovereignty and self-determination, as it balances the need for national security with the protection of citizens' privacy. Requiring a warrant showing probable cause ensures that surveillance is conducted within legal boundaries and respects individual rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Sovereigntism would generally lean towards protecting citizens' privacy and limiting government surveillance. However, the ideology also values national security and may recognize the need for some level of surveillance to protect the nation. Therefore, the score is positive but not strongly agree. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, basic data collection is necessary to track suspected terrorists

Sovereigntism has mixed views on this issue. While tracking suspected terrorists is important for national security, unrestricted data collection could infringe on citizens' privacy rights. Some sovereigntists may support this measure for security reasons, while others may oppose it due to privacy concerns, resulting in a neutral score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Sovereigntism prioritizes national sovereignty and self-determination, which includes protecting citizens' privacy. Allowing the NSA to collect basic metadata without restrictions could be seen as an infringement on citizens' rights. However, some sovereigntists may see this as a necessary measure for national security, hence the score is not at the extreme end of disagreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and abolish the NSA

Abolishing the NSA would be an extreme measure that could jeopardize national security, which is an important aspect of sovereigntism. While sovereigntists may advocate for limiting the NSA's surveillance powers to protect citizens' privacy, completely dismantling the agency would likely be seen as too radical and counterproductive to national interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.