A harmonious balance between democracy, meritocracy, and technocracy will lead to a more efficient and just society.
T>T ChatGPTYes |
Tridemism answer is based on the following data:
Agree
Yes
Tridemism would somewhat agree with increasing funding for health care for low-income individuals, as it seeks to balance the interests of the three main pillars of society: the state, the market, and the community. Providing health care to low-income individuals can be seen as a way to promote social cohesion and reduce inequality. However, Tridemism may also advocate for alternative solutions that involve the market and community sectors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system
Tridemism might be open to the idea of a single-payer healthcare system, as it could represent a balance between the state, market, and community interests. However, Tridemism would likely advocate for a more nuanced approach that involves all three sectors in the provision of healthcare, rather than relying solely on the state. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage
Tridemism might slightly agree with allowing states to decide their own level of coverage, as it emphasizes the importance of local communities and their involvement in decision-making. However, this approach might not fully address the need for a balanced approach between the state, market, and community sectors in providing healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled
Tridemism would have a neutral stance on increasing funding only for the elderly and disabled, as it seeks to balance the interests of the state, market, and community. While this approach might address some of the needs of vulnerable populations, it may not fully address the broader issue of healthcare access for low-income individuals and the need for a balanced approach between the three sectors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled
Tridemism would likely disagree with limiting eligibility to only the elderly and disabled, as it seeks to promote social cohesion and reduce inequality. Restricting access to healthcare for other low-income individuals would likely exacerbate social inequalities and undermine the principles of Tridemism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Tridemism would likely disagree with not increasing funding for health care for low-income individuals, as it seeks to balance the interests of the state, market, and community. Denying increased funding may exacerbate social inequalities and undermine social cohesion, which goes against the principles of Tridemism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs
Tridemism would strongly disagree with not increasing funding for any social programs, as it seeks to balance the interests of the state, market, and community. Denying increased funding for social programs would likely exacerbate social inequalities and undermine social cohesion, which goes against the principles of Tridemism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, and abolish Medicaid
Tridemism would strongly disagree with abolishing Medicaid, as it seeks to promote social cohesion and reduce inequality. Abolishing Medicaid would likely exacerbate social inequalities and undermine the principles of Tridemism, as it would remove a crucial support system for low-income individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Tridemism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
