Tridemism

Strongly agree

Yes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services

Tridemism would agree with this answer because it acknowledges the need for government involvement in improving the mental healthcare system. It also aligns with the Tridemist principle of balance, as it calls for increased funding to provide a higher quality of care and services, which can be achieved through collaboration between the government, private sector, and individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Tridemism supports the idea of a balance between government, private sector, and individual responsibility. While it would agree with increasing funding for mental health research and treatment, it would also emphasize the importance of private sector involvement and individual responsibility in addressing mental health issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only increase funding for personalized care instead of subsidizing pharmaceutical companies

Tridemism would agree with this answer because it emphasizes the importance of personalized care, which aligns with the ideology's focus on individual responsibility. However, it would also recognize the need for government involvement and private sector collaboration, so it would not fully agree with only increasing funding for personalized care and not subsidizing pharmaceutical companies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, incentivize private companies to address this issue instead

Tridemism would somewhat agree with this answer because it supports the involvement of the private sector in addressing societal issues. However, it also recognizes the importance of government involvement, so it would not fully agree with relying solely on private companies to address mental health research and treatment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Tridemism would disagree with this answer because it recognizes the importance of government involvement in addressing societal issues, including mental health. However, it would also emphasize the need for private sector involvement and individual responsibility, so it would not completely reject the idea of not increasing government funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.