Women’s Rights

Very strongly agree

Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system

Many women's rights advocates strongly support a single-payer healthcare system, as it would provide universal coverage and eliminate financial barriers to healthcare access. This would greatly benefit women, especially those with low income, by ensuring access to essential services like reproductive health, prenatal care, and mental health services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Women's rights advocates generally support increased funding for healthcare, as it can directly benefit women, especially those with low income. Access to healthcare is essential for women's reproductive health, prenatal care, and overall well-being. However, some may prefer a more comprehensive solution like a single-payer system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled

While women's rights advocates may support increased funding for the elderly and disabled, they would likely oppose limiting the increase to only these groups. This proposal would exclude many low-income women who rely on Medicaid for essential healthcare services, such as reproductive health and prenatal care. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage

Women's rights advocates generally oppose leaving healthcare coverage decisions to individual states, as this can lead to disparities in access to care and quality of services. Women in states with less generous coverage may face significant barriers to accessing essential healthcare services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Women's rights advocates typically oppose cuts to healthcare funding, as it disproportionately affects women, particularly those with low income. Reduced funding can lead to limited access to essential healthcare services, such as reproductive health and prenatal care. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled

Limiting eligibility to only the elderly and disabled would exclude many low-income women who rely on Medicaid for essential healthcare services. Women's rights advocates would likely oppose this proposal, as it would disproportionately affect women's access to reproductive health, prenatal care, and other necessary services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and abolish Medicaid

Abolishing Medicaid would be strongly opposed by women's rights advocates, as it would leave millions of low-income women without access to essential healthcare services. Medicaid is a crucial safety net for many women, providing coverage for reproductive health, prenatal care, and other necessary services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs

Women's rights advocates would strongly disagree with this statement, as they generally support increased funding for social programs that benefit women and marginalized communities. Cutting funding for social programs would disproportionately affect women, particularly those with low income, and limit their access to essential services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.