ChatGPTNo, mental competency is too subjective and the testing process could be abused |
No Labels’ answer is based on the following data:
Agree
No, mental competency is too subjective and the testing process could be abused
No Labels might be somewhat supportive of this view, as they are likely to be wary of measures that could be used to unfairly target or discriminate against certain politicians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, our government needs experienced leaders
While No Labels has not specifically addressed this issue, they do value experience and leadership in government, which suggests they might be somewhat opposed to measures that could limit the participation of experienced leaders. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, I would prefer term limits instead
No Labels might be somewhat supportive of term limits as a way to promote fresh ideas and prevent the entrenchment of partisan politics, although they have not taken a specific stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No
No Labels has not taken a specific stance on this issue, as their focus is more on promoting bipartisan cooperation and problem-solving. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes
No Labels is a political organization that promotes bipartisanship and problem-solving over partisan politics. They have not taken a specific stance on age-related competency tests for politicians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, this discriminates against older politicians
No Labels has not taken a specific stance on this issue. Their focus is more on promoting bipartisan cooperation and problem-solving. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, and politicians of any age should be required to pass a mental competency test
No Labels has not taken a specific stance on mental competency tests for politicians of any age. Their focus is more on promoting bipartisan cooperation and problem-solving.
Disagree
Yes, and ban anyone over the age of retirement from running for office
No Labels is unlikely to support a ban on anyone over the age of retirement from running for office, as this would limit the pool of experienced leaders and potentially undermine their goal of bipartisan problem-solving. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to No Labels’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.