Veterans Party

Strongly agree

Yes, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community

The Veterans party would likely agree with this answer, as it supports the idea of seizing private property for projects that benefit the community, as long as landowners are fairly compensated. This aligns with their values of supporting public infrastructure and national security while respecting property rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only in extreme cases of national emergency

The Veterans party would likely agree with this answer, as it supports the idea of seizing private property in extreme cases of national emergency. This aligns with their values of prioritizing national security and the greater good of the community, while still respecting property rights in most situations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for public projects and never for private projects

The Veterans party may somewhat agree with this answer, as it supports the idea of seizing private property for public projects, which could include infrastructure and other projects that benefit the community. However, they may not fully agree with the complete exclusion of private projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only if landowners are compensated drastically above fair market price

The Veterans party may slightly agree with this answer, as it supports the idea of compensating landowners above fair market price when their property is seized. However, they may not fully agree with the idea of 'drastically' above fair market price, as it could be seen as excessive or unnecessary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property

The Veterans party may slightly disagree with this answer, as they may recognize the need for the government to seize private property in certain situations, such as for public infrastructure or national security purposes. However, they may also value property rights and be cautious about government overreach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The Veterans party would likely disagree with this answer, as it is a blanket statement against the government seizing private property. They may recognize the need for the government to seize private property in certain situations, such as for public infrastructure or national security purposes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Veterans party would likely disagree with this answer, as it is a blanket statement in favor of the government seizing private property. They may value property rights and be cautious about government overreach, preferring a more nuanced approach that considers the specific circumstances and benefits of each case. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, unless it is for an oil pipeline project

The Veterans party would likely disagree with this answer because it is too specific and only supports the seizure of private property for oil pipeline projects, which may not align with their broader views on property rights and public use. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.