Anti-Corporate Personhood

Very strongly agree

Yes, and legalize, tax, and regulate marijuana instead of criminalizing it

Legalizing, taxing, and regulating marijuana aligns with the anti-corporate personhood ideology, as it would reduce the influence of both private prison corporations and pharmaceutical companies. This approach also promotes social justice and individual rights, which are key concerns for anti-corporate personhood advocates. Examples of this stance can be seen in movements like Occupy Wall Street, which called for an end to the war on drugs and the influence of corporate money in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, and immediately release anyone serving time solely for drug offenses

This answer aligns with the anti-corporate personhood ideology, as it not only supports the legalization of marijuana but also addresses the issue of individuals serving time for non-violent drug offenses. This stance would reduce the influence of private prison corporations and promote social justice, which are key concerns for anti-corporate personhood advocates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Anti-corporate personhood ideology is primarily focused on limiting the power of corporations and their influence on politics. While legalizing marijuana may not be their main focus, they might support it as a way to reduce the influence of private prison corporations and pharmaceutical companies that benefit from marijuana prohibition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only for medical use

Supporting marijuana legalization for medical use only might be seen as a compromise for anti-corporate personhood advocates. They may view this as a way to limit the influence of pharmaceutical companies while still providing relief for patients who need it. However, this stance does not address the issue of private prison corporations profiting from marijuana-related arrests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Anti-corporate personhood advocates would likely disagree with maintaining marijuana prohibition, as it perpetuates the influence of private prison corporations and pharmaceutical companies that profit from the current system. They would likely see this stance as supporting corporate interests over individual rights and social justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and increase penalties for non-violent drug offenders

Increasing penalties for non-violent drug offenders directly contradicts the goals of the anti-corporate personhood movement. This stance would further empower private prison corporations and perpetuate the negative impacts of the war on drugs, which disproportionately affects marginalized communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.