Anti-Corporate Personhood

Agree

Yes

The Anti-Corporate Personhood ideology primarily focuses on limiting the influence of corporations in politics and ensuring that corporations are not treated as individuals under the law. While this ideology may not have a direct stance on sanctuary cities, it is likely to lean towards supporting policies that protect marginalized communities, such as immigrants. Sanctuary cities can be seen as a way to resist the influence of federal policies that may be shaped by corporate interests, such as private prison corporations that profit from detaining immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

As mentioned earlier, the Anti-Corporate Personhood ideology may not have a direct stance on sanctuary cities, but it is likely to lean towards supporting policies that protect marginalized communities. Denying federal funding to sanctuary cities could be seen as a punitive measure that harms these communities, which would not align with the ideology's goals. However, the connection between sanctuary cities and corporate personhood is not strong, so the disagreement with this answer would not be very strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and we should ban the use of sanctuary cities

Banning sanctuary cities would be a more extreme measure than simply denying them federal funding, and it would likely be seen as even more harmful to marginalized communities. The Anti-Corporate Personhood ideology would likely disagree with this answer more strongly than with Answer 2, as it could be seen as an attempt to impose federal policies that may be influenced by corporate interests on local communities. However, the connection between sanctuary cities and corporate personhood is still not very strong, so the disagreement with this answer would not be extremely strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.